Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Arthur Minwoo Chung"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
KRAS Mutation Test in Korean Patients with Colorectal Carcinomas: A Methodological Comparison between Sanger Sequencing and a Real-Time PCR-Based Assay
Sung Hak Lee, Arthur Minwoo Chung, Ahwon Lee, Woo Jin Oh, Yeong Jin Choi, Youn-Soo Lee, Eun Sun Jung
J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(1):24-31.   Published online December 25, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.10.03
  • 9,244 View
  • 151 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Background
Mutations in the KRAS gene have been identified in approximately 50% of colorectal cancers (CRCs). KRAS mutations are well established biomarkers in anti–epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Therefore, assessment of KRAS mutations is needed in CRC patients to ensure appropriate treatment.
Methods
We compared the analytical performance of the cobas test to Sanger sequencing in 264 CRC cases. In addition, discordant specimens were evaluated by 454 pyrosequencing.
Results
KRAS mutations for codons 12/13 were detected in 43.2% of cases (114/264) by Sanger sequencing. Of 257 evaluable specimens for comparison, KRAS mutations were detected in 112 cases (43.6%) by Sanger sequencing and 118 cases (45.9%) by the cobas test. Concordance between the cobas test and Sanger sequencing for each lot was 93.8% positive percent agreement (PPA) and 91.0% negative percent agreement (NPA) for codons 12/13. Results from the cobas test and Sanger sequencing were discordant for 20 cases (7.8%). Twenty discrepant cases were subsequently subjected to 454 pyrosequencing. After comprehensive analysis of the results from combined Sanger sequencing–454 pyrosequencing and the cobas test, PPA was 97.5% and NPA was 100%.
Conclusions
The cobas test is an accurate and sensitive test for detecting KRAS-activating mutations and has analytical power equivalent to Sanger sequencing. Prescreening using the cobas test with subsequent application of Sanger sequencing is the best strategy for routine detection of KRAS mutations in CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Single-center study on clinicopathological and typical molecular pathologic features of metastatic brain tumor
    Su Hwa Kim, Young Suk Lee, Sung Hak Lee, Yeoun Eun Sung, Ahwon Lee, Jun Kang, Jae-Sung Park, Sin Soo Jeun, Youn Soo Lee
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine.2023; 57(4): 217.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of KRAS and NRAS status in metastatic colorectal cancer: Experience of the National Institute of Oncology in Rabat Morocco
    Chaimaa Mounjid, Hajar El Agouri, Youssef Mahdi, Abdelilah Laraqui, En-nacer Chtati, Soumaya Ech-charif, Mouna Khmou, Youssef Bakri, Amine Souadka, Basma El Khannoussi
    Annals of Cancer Research and Therapy.2022; 30(2): 80.     CrossRef
  • The current understanding on the impact of KRAS on colorectal cancer
    Mingjing Meng, Keying Zhong, Ting Jiang, Zhongqiu Liu, Hiu Yee Kwan, Tao Su
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 140: 111717.     CrossRef
  • Droplet digital PCR revealed high concordance between primary tumors and lymph node metastases in multiplex screening of KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer
    Barbora Vanova, Michal Kalman, Karin Jasek, Ivana Kasubova, Tatiana Burjanivova, Anna Farkasova, Peter Kruzliak, Dietrich Busselberg, Lukas Plank, Zora Lasabova
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2019; 19(2): 219.     CrossRef
  • CRISPR Technology for Breast Cancer: Diagnostics, Modeling, and Therapy
    Rachel L. Mintz, Madeleine A. Gao, Kahmun Lo, Yeh‐Hsing Lao, Mingqiang Li, Kam W. Leong
    Advanced Biosystems.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
Brief Case Report
Human Papillomavirus Infection–Associated Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Hard Palate
Arthur Minwoo Chung, Dong Il Sun, Eun Sun Jung, Youn Soo Lee
J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(3):329-331.   Published online December 5, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.07.07
  • 7,349 View
  • 104 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Skull Base: Response to Radiation Therapy and Outcomes in a Retrospective Case Series
    Shekhar K. Gadkaree, Anuraag S. Parikh, Alejandro I. Rodarte, Ashton Lehmann, Stacey T. Gray, Derrick T. Lin
    Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base.2020; 81(05): 505.     CrossRef
Original Article
Differential Immunohistochemical Profiles for Distinguishing Prostate Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma
Woo Jin Oh, Arthur Minwoo Chung, Jee Soon Kim, Ji Heun Han, Sung Hoo Hong, Ji Yeol Lee, Yeong Jin Choi
J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(5):345-354.   Published online August 7, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2016.06.14
  • 10,987 View
  • 316 Download
  • 25 Web of Science
  • 28 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
The pathologic distinction between high-grade prostate adenocarcinoma (PAC) involving the urinary bladder and high-grade urothelial carcinoma (UC) infiltrating the prostate can be difficult. However, making this distinction is clinically important because of the different treatment modalities for these two entities.
Methods
A total of 249 patient cases (PAC, 111 cases; UC, 138 cases) collected between June 1995 and July 2009 at Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital were studied. An immunohistochemical evaluation of prostatic markers (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA], prostate acid phosphatase [PAP], P501s, NKX3.1, and α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase [AMACR]) and urothelial markers (CK34βE12, p63, thrombomodulin, S100P, and GATA binding protein 3 [GATA3]) was performed using tissue microarrays from each tumor.
Results
The sensitivities of prostatic markers in PAC were 100% for PSA, 83.8% for PSMA, 91.9% for PAP, 93.7% for P501s, 88.3% for NKX 3.1, and 66.7% for AMACR. However, the urothelial markers CK34βE12, p63, thrombomodulin, S100P, and GATA3 were also positive in 1.8%, 0%, 0%, 3.6%, and 0% of PAC, respectively. The sensitivities of urothelial markers in UC were 75.4% for CK34βE12, 73.9% for p63, 45.7% for thrombomodulin, 22.5% for S100P, and 84.8% for GATA3. Conversely, the prostatic markers PSA, PSMA, PAP, P501s, NKX3.1, and AMACR were also positive in 9.4%, 0.7%, 18.8%, 0.7%, 0%, and 8.7% of UCs, respectively.
Conclusions
Prostatic and urothelial markers, including PSA, NKX3.1, p63, thrombomodulin, and GATA3 are very useful for differentiating PAC from UC. The optimal combination of prostatic and urothelial markers could improve the ability to differentiate PAC from UC pathologically.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Unusual Perineal Metastasis in a Case of Prostate Cancer on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT
    Ritanshu Solanki, Bhagwant Rai Mittal, Rajender Kumar, Aravindh Sekar, Narender Kumar
    Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2024; 49(2): e73.     CrossRef
  • NKX3.1 Expression in Non-Prostatic Tumors and Characterizing its Expression in Esophageal/Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
    Ansa Mehreen, Kiran G. Manjee, Divyangi Paralkar, Gladell P. Paner, Thanh Lan
    Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2024; 31(3): 202.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Management of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate
    Gabriel Wasinger, Olivier Cussenot, Eva Compérat
    Cancers.2024; 16(9): 1650.     CrossRef
  • Metastatic prostate cancer presenting as a posterior mediastinal mass: A rare presentation
    Muhammad Haider, Arun Umesh Mahtani, Bachar Botrus, Foma Munoh Kenne, Madiha Fatima Master
    Clinical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of GATA3 Immunohistochemistry in Urothelial Carcinoma
    Daeseon Yoo, Kyueng-Whan Min, Jung-Soo Pyo, Nae Yu Kim
    Medicina.2023; 59(8): 1452.     CrossRef
  • Primary high-grade urothelial carcinoma of prostate with prostatic hyperplasia: a rare case report and review of the literature
    Liang Liu, Fu-zhen Sun, Pan-ying Zhang, Yu Xiao, Xiao Yue, Dong-Ming Wang, Qiang Wang
    The Aging Male.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Expression of Gata Binding Protein 3 as a Prognostic Factor in Urogenital Lesions and Its Association With Morphology
    T Govardhan, Debahuti Mohapatra, Sujata Naik, Prateek Das, Pranita Mohanty, Ankita Pal
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Histological and immunohistochemical investigation of canine prostate carcinoma with identification of common intraductal carcinoma component
    Simone de Brot, Jennifer Lothion‐Roy, Llorenç Grau‐Roma, Emily White, Franco Guscetti, Mark A. Rubin, Nigel P. Mongan
    Veterinary and Comparative Oncology.2022; 20(1): 38.     CrossRef
  • Urothelial Carcinoma and Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen: Cellular, Imaging, and Prognostic Implications
    Arsalan Tariq, Amy E. McCart Reed, Andrew Morton, Sima Porten, Ian Vela, Elizabeth D. Williams, John W. Yaxley, Peter C. Black, Matthew J. Roberts
    European Urology Focus.2022; 8(5): 1256.     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemical Reactivity of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Salivary Gland Tumors
    Haruto Nishida, Yoshihiko Kondo, Takahiro Kusaba, Hiroko Kadowaki, Tsutomu Daa
    Head and Neck Pathology.2022; 16(2): 427.     CrossRef
  • Weak NKX3.1 expression in a urothelial carcinoma: A diagnostic pitfall
    Maryam Abdo, Robert Hoyt, Ashley Highfill, Daniel Mettman
    Human Pathology Reports.2022; 27: 300599.     CrossRef
  • Gene of the month: NKX3.1
    Jon Griffin, Yuqing Chen, James W F Catto, Sherif El-Khamisy
    Journal of Clinical Pathology.2022; 75(6): 361.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Value of GATA3 and Uroplakin 3 in Differentiating Urothelial Carcinoma from Prostatic and Colorectal Carcinoma
    Maha Salama, Dina A. Khairy
    Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2022; 10(A): 514.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic challenges for the distinction of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma and high-grade urothelial carcinoma of simultaneous occurrences - A literature review
    Shreyas Bhushan Jayade, Manana Jikurashvili
    GEORGIAN SCIENTISTS.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cytomorphology, immunoprofile, and clinicopathologic correlation of metastatic prostatic carcinoma
    Xiaoqi Lin, Qiuying Shi, Ximing J. Yang
    Human Pathology.2022; 130: 36.     CrossRef
  • Cutaneous Metastasis of Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Presentation of a Common Disease
    Alexander Dills, Okechukwu Obi, Kevin Bustos, Jesse Jiang, Shweta Gupta
    Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports.2021; 9: 232470962199076.     CrossRef
  • Mining The Cancer Genome Atlas gene expression data for lineage markers in distinguishing bladder urothelial carcinoma and prostate adenocarcinoma
    Ewe Seng Ch’ng
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immunohistochemical analysis of thrombomodulin expression in myocardial tissue from autopsy cases of ischemic heart disease
    Takeshi Kondo, Motonori Takahashi, Gentaro Yamasaki, Marie Sugimoto, Azumi Kuse, Mai Morichika, Kanako Nakagawa, Makoto Sakurada, Migiwa Asano, Yasuhiro Ueno
    Legal Medicine.2021; 51: 101897.     CrossRef
  • Application and Pitfalls of Immunohistochemistry in Diagnosis of Challenging Genitourinary Cases
    Jenny Ross, Guangyuan Li, Ximing J. Yang
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2020; 144(3): 290.     CrossRef
  • New Screening Test Improves Detection of Prostate Cancer Using Circulating Tumor Cells and Prostate-Specific Markers
    Karin Ried, Tasnuva Tamanna, Sonja Matthews, Peter Eng, Avni Sali
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Unlikely Culprit: Gastric Metastasis from Primary Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
    Eric Omar Then, Spoorthi Nutakki, Andrew Ofosu, Saad Saleem, Vijay Gayam, Tagore Sunkara, Vinaya Gaduputi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2020; 51(3): 1081.     CrossRef
  • MRI of prostatic urethral mucinous urothelial carcinoma: Expanding the differential diagnosis for T2 hyperintense prostatic masses
    Neel Patel, Bryan R. Foster, Elena K. Korngold, Kyle Jensen, Kevin R. Turner, Fergus V. Coakley
    Clinical Imaging.2020; 68: 68.     CrossRef
  • Morphological and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Distinguishing Prostate Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review
    Francesca Sanguedolce, Davide Russo, Vito Mancini, Oscar Selvaggio, Beppe Calò, Giuseppe Carrieri, Luigi Cormio
    International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2019; 27(2): 120.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Metastatic Prostate Cancer to the Urethra That Resolved After Androgen Deprivation Therapy
    Darren J. Bryk, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Eric A. Klein
    Urology.2019; 129: e4.     CrossRef
  • The Homeodomain Transcription Factor NKX3.1 Modulates Bladder Outlet Obstruction Induced Fibrosis in Mice
    Mehul S. Patel, Diana K. Bowen, Nicholas M. Tassone, Andrew D. Gould, Kirsten S. Kochan, Paula R. Firmiss, Natalie A. Kukulka, Megan Y. Devine, Belinda Li, Edward M. Gong, Robert W. Dettman
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer of unknown primary: Ancillary testing of cytologic and small biopsy specimens in the era of targeted therapy
    Morgan L. Cowan, Christopher J. VandenBussche
    Cancer Cytopathology.2018; 126(S8): 724.     CrossRef
  • Glandular Tumors of the Urachus and Urinary Bladder: A Practical Overview of a Broad Differential Diagnosis
    Alexander S. Taylor, Rohit Mehra, Aaron M. Udager
    Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.2018; 142(10): 1164.     CrossRef
  • S100P as a Marker for Urothelial Histogenesis: A Critical Review and Comparison With Novel and Traditional Urothelial Immunohistochemical Markers
    Moushumi Suryavanshi, Julian Sanz-Ortega, Deepika Sirohi, Mukul K. Divatia, Chisato Ohe, Claudia Zampini, Daniel Luthringer, Steven C. Smith, Mahul B. Amin
    Advances in Anatomic Pathology.2017; 24(3): 151.     CrossRef
Brief Case Report
Primary Neurilemmoma of the Thyroid Gland Clinically Mimicking Malignant Thyroid Nodule
Young Sub Lee, Jee Soon Kim, Arthur Minwoo Chung, Woo Chan Park, Tae-Jung Kim
J Pathol Transl Med. 2016;50(2):168-171.   Published online October 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2015.08.26
  • 7,709 View
  • 67 Download
  • 3 Crossref
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Case of Intra-thyroidal Schwannoma Diagnosed by Preoperative Core Needle Biopsy
    Dong Gyu Choi, Young-Ok Kim, Min Jung Jung, Hyoung Shin Lee
    Korean Society for Head and Neck Oncology.2023; 39(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal ultrasound imaging of primary thyroid schwannoma
    Hai Na Zhao, Bu Yun Ma, Feng Yan, Yu Lan Peng
    Medicine.2021; 100(16): e25517.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Anterior Cervical Intramuscular Schwannoma in the Strap Muscle
    Seul Gi Lee, Ho-Ryun Won, Bon Seok Koo, Jae Won Chang
    Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.2021; 64(4): 263.     CrossRef

J Pathol Transl Med : Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine